Blog Archives

Pilate’s Wife

“And while he was sitting in the judgment seat his wife sent to him, saying, ‘You do nothing to that righteous one for I have suffered greatly today as a result of a dream about him.’”

(Matthew 27:19)


Not only is Matthew the only Gospel writer to record this warning from Pilate’s wife, he is the only Gospel writer to record God speaking through dreams at all, though in every other account, the dreams that Matthew records are those that take place as part of the birth narrative. In fact, in the Gospel narrative, the dreams are nearly all warnings about the attacks from a wicked king (Herod); here this dream stands as a warning against harming a righteous king. In each of the birth narrative dreams, the dream is also designed to protect Jesus from harm; so too, this dream is designed to protect Jesus from harm once again — or at least to serve as one additional warning so that Pilate, Herod, and the wicked priests around him would stand without excuse for the evil that they were doing.

Some medieval theologians suggested that the dream to Pilate’s wife was sent by Satan to thwart the design of God to sacrifice his Son, but that does not seem fitting either with the way that Matthew has been recording dreams and it seems to give Satan too much insight into the design of God. Satan’s aim is to see Jesus dead — his plan throughout history was one designed to destroy the promised seed of Eve. For him to seek to stop the execution would be for him to realize and comprehend the plan of God which is not likely. He saw this death as his victory even though it would become his eternal defeat.

Nevertheless, the warning is given and ignored. We know nothing more of Pilate’s wife. Several apocryphal traditions identify her as Claudia Procula, the granddaughter of Emperor Augustus, and as later becoming a Christian as a result of this dream. But we know nothing of the veracity of these things. The earliest church traditions do not speak of such a thing and Origen, the 3rd century Church Father from Alexandria, was the first to speak of her conversion though it should be noted that Origen is known (along with many of his contemporaries) for his spiritualizing of the Biblical texts.

What we know is that Pilate’s wife was tormented by this dream which motivated her to speak with her husband on the matter. Perhaps even the tormenting was meant as a foretaste of the judgment that was to come for the wicked apart from a savior. We simply do not know and are not given enough information to speculate with confidence. What we can say with confidence is that God’s design is being fulfilled and that those who stand in opposition to him will face judgment not only in this life but eternally. There is no speculation as to this matter.

Friends, if you have not given your life to Christ, I beg you to pray to God for the faith to do so. And, if you are a believer, I pray that you share the good news that you know to be true with others. Pilate’s wife was tormented by this dream over the wickedness her husband was about to commit. Lot is described as tormenting his soul over the wickedness of the people living in Sodom around him (2 Peter 2:7-8). Why is it that our souls are so often content with the eternal punishment awaiting those in our midst? Will not we be held accountable for all those we loved so little as to not share the source of eternal reconciliation, love, and hope with them?



Forms of Special Revelation

Forms of Special Revelation:

We have been speaking of and citing some of the weaknesses of General Revelation and our need for something more.  Yet, let us point out that General Revelation was never designed to teach us our obligation towards God and our proper relationship to him as our creator.  Indeed, it was never designed to even guide us in morality even if the fall were not to have taken place.  How do we know this?  It is because God engaged in Special Revelation prior to the fall of mankind.  God gave Adam the law in the garden and regularly communicated with him in terms of instructing him in his role as regent over the creation.  We are also told that God was prone to walk through the garden (by implication, to speak with Adam and Eve).  Thus, communication beyond what could be learned from nature was part of God’s pre-fall relationship with his creatures.  Now, one could argue that all revelation from God is Special Revelation.  Was not God the author of the genetic code by which organic creatures function?  Was God not the author of the laws of science by which the physical bodies of the universe operate?  Certainly the limitation of understanding science lies within us, not within God’s revelation of it in creation.  And certainly, in our fallen state, we sometimes mis-interpret the Special Revelation that is given to us.  Thus, the important thing to note is that the purpose of General and Special Revelation is different.  General reveals broadly and to all; Special reveals narrowly (dealing especially with God and our relationship with and obligation towards him) and only to whom it is delivered.  How many people have read the scriptures only to come away with heretical teachings?  Thus, not only is it delivered to few, its proper interpretation requires insight from the Holy Spirit, who effectively guides Special Revelation’s delivery.

We can categorize Special Revelation in the following way:

  1. Manifestations of God:  God manifests himself to his people to guide them, encourage them, and teach them.  And, God has done this in a variety of ways.
    1. Theophanies:  Where God physically presents himself to the prophet while the prophet is awake and aware of such taking place.  For example, God descended upon Mount Sinai when the law was given, He appeared to Job in a whirlwind, and He spoke to Elijah on Mount Sinai to mention just a few.
    2. Visions:  This is where God manifests himself in a vision (not physically) to a prophet who is awake and aware of what is taking place.  God came to Abram in a vision, to Samuel, and to the prophet Isaiah again to name just a few. 
    3. Dreams:  This is where God manifests himself visually (not physically) to a prophet who is asleep.  God communicated this way to Jacob, to Joseph the son of Jacob, and to Joseph, the earthly adoptive father of Jesus again to name just a few.
    4. In his Son:  Jesus is the ultimate manifestation of God given not just to the prophets, but to all people.  He is also the perfect image of the invisible God and the object of all Special Revelation.  All of scripture, not just the Gospels, points to Jesus.
  2. Prophesy:  God also speaks to and through his prophets.  The role of the prophet, as we have already discussed, is to faithfully be the mouth of God to his people.  The role of prophesy is two-fold: it is to foretell and to forthtell.  While some prophesy does speak of things that will take place in the future (foretell), the bulk of prophesy is to speak forth God’s word to the people of God, for rebuke and encouragement (forthtell).  With this before us, God speaks prophetically in a variety of ways.
    1. Direct Verbal Prophesy:  God speaks directly to his prophets and then the prophets relate it either orally or in writing to God’s people.  This is the “thus says the Lord” clause in scripture.
    2. Indirect Prophesy:  God also spoke to his people through indirect means.  God gave the High Priest the Urim and Thummim, by drawing lots, and signs.
    3. Typology:  As God is the God of history, it is not surprising that God would order events in similar ways as a means of demonstrating his hand at work.  Typology is the study of these repetitions through persons, events, or institutions that are repeated with intensification in the events that follow—usually pointing toward Christ.  For example, the institution of the priesthood, particularly that of the High Priest was designed to prefigure Christ’s priesthood.  Moses, as a mediator for his people, prefigures Christ’s mediatorial work.  There are many more such events that God has arranged in such a way as that they point to what is to come.
  3. Miracles:  While miracles are not sufficient in and of themselves to generate faith, but they are given to confirm and strengthen the faith that is already present.  They were given as signs that the prophets were genuine and given as signs that Jesus really is the Son of God.




In a sense, scripture is the ultimate Special Revelation of God as it is the record of the forms of Special Revelation we have already spoken of that is preserved in writing for God’s people through history.  Scripture is the ultimate manifestation of God’s special Revelation to his people, revealing Christ and uniting in Christ all of these separate forms of Special Revelation.  Thus, with the close of scripture, the necessity of such authoritative revelation from God has ceased.  Scripture reveals Christ in his fullness for God’s people and thus, the completed canon of scripture is given to us as the capstone upon which our faith is held together.  It is, according to the Apostle Peter when comparing the scriptures to his own experience of walking with Christ and witnessing (as well as performing) miracles, something that is “more sure.”  Thus, we have General Revelation and Special Revelation, and all of the many forms of Special Revelation find their climax in the Scriptures—the written word of God.

Genesis 3:8.

Exodus 19:16-20.

Job 38:1.

1 Kings 19:12ff.

Genesis 15:1.

1 Samuel 3:15.

Isaiah 1:1.

Genesis 28:12.

Genesis 37:5.

Matthew 1:20.

This phrase occurs 414 times in the Bible, some examples are: Exodus 4:22, Isaiah 37:33, and Jeremiah 23:16.

Numbers 27:21.

1 Samuel 10:20, Jonah 1:7, Acts 1:26.

Judges 6:17 ff.

Hebrews 1:1-4.

This is a view that is hotly debated by the Pentecostal and Charismatic movements in the church, and this is not the place to go into an extensive discussion of the relevant issues.  In short, the Pentecostal and Charismatic movements would look to what they refer to as gifts of the Holy Spirit (Prophesy and Tongues) from the New Testament as normative for the church in all ages.  In response, the question must be asked, “Is the canon of scripture closed?”  Certainly that is the Bible’s own testimony about itself, as we have discussed.  If there is continuing authoritative prophesy, for example, thus God speaking verbatim (thus says the Lord) through an agent to his people, are you not adding to scripture?  There are many good books which argue on both sides of the debate, but the most important aspect of this discussion is what scripture says of itself.  Scripture’s testimony, as we have discussed, is that it is complete and sufficient for matters of faith and matters of life.  If it is complete and sufficient, why is there need for further supernatural revelation to be given?

2 Peter 1:19.