Titles and Doctors in the Church

“You are not to be called “Rabbi;” for you have one teacher and you are all brothers.”

(Matthew 23:8)

In Hebrew, the term “Rabbi” was and is used to someone who is an esteemed teacher in the church — literally, the word means “great one,” which shows you some of the esteem that the Jewish culture attributes to those who handle and teach the word of God. In Christian circles, it is perhaps equivalent to the esteem shown to seminary professors or to those who are respected enough to be called to speak at this conference or at that church here or there.

The Latin equivalent is “Doctor,” which literally means “teacher,” though the Latin text of Matthew 23:8 uses the term Magister (meaning master or ruler) instead of simply translating the Greek in its context. Sometimes that sounds a bit odd to our western ears as we most commonly think of doctors of medicine, not doctors of theology. Even so, doctors of theology were around long before medicine became an organized discipline. 

Now, do not misunderstand what it is that I am about to say. I am not denigrating education, formal or informal, nor would I discourage pastors from continuing their education beyond seminary — I am doing that myself and I serve on the Advisory Board for the North American Reformed Seminary and I teach at a mission seminary in Ukraine. Education is an essential part of the ministry. And while indeed we are men of one book, to become so, we are also men of many books that serve the one book. Regular reading and a growing library is simply par for the course if you are in the Christian ministry. Woe to the pastor that shirks this duty. And it is a pleasurable duty indeed!

Yet, sometimes it is the title of “doctor” that causes men to seek education instead of the title of Doctor being given as a byproduct of the education a man pursues. This, I fear, often leads to pride and a sense of superiority; something that should not be a part of the makeup of the Christian pastor or church leader. And this is of what our Lord is speaking in the verse noted above.

And that leads us to the question…who should award the title of “doctor” to a teacher in the life of the Church? For a number of years I have advocated the Roman Catholic practice of proclaiming someone a “Doctor of the Church” after looking back at his or her contributions to the church itself. If one takes this model, it is the church that awards the title, not the institution. 

In my own context, that then would fall to presbyteries or synods to make such pronouncements that Pastor So-and-So made such a contribution to the establishment of or teaching of the church hat at some point, the church would proclaim him one of their “doctors.”

This, of course, is reflected in the difference between an “earned degree” and an “honorary degree.” And though I would humbly assert that an honorary degree is of more value, it is typically the earned degree that people seek out. Yet, which is more valuable: That which I have done or the church’s recognition of what I have done? I would argue for the second. In a world filled with everyone getting degrees for virtually everything under the sun, it is something to think about.

Advertisements

6 Comments

  1. Robert Chamberlain

    Very interesting. My church circles expect an undergraduate or master’s degree in theology for someone to be a pastor. Not sure what you think about that but by the sounds of it, that approach isn’t very Biblical. We should be judged by our gifts and graces rather than our intellect and degrees…

    Like

    1. preacherwin

      Robert, my tradition, as well requires at least a Masters’ of Divinity. That said, there is some inequity there. My wife, for example, has a Master’s in education…which required 36 Credits. My MDiv was 104 credits. Had I stayed in education, I could have done a Masters and 2 doctorates by the time I just did a Masters in Divinity. It is the oldest and largest of any Masters program.

      Yet, don’t get me wrong. I am a proponent of education — just, I am not convinced that the education needs to be all in an institutional setting. So, I think that Synods and Presbyteries should have thorough examinations on the Bible, Theology, Church History, and Church Polity. A pastor ought to “know his stuff” — so it’s not just the gifts and the potential, there needs to be training too…and wisdom (most churches can chew up and spit out their pastors if he is unwise in his leadership). So there is a balance. Thanks for your comments.

      Like

      1. Robert Chamberlain

        That’s helpful. A pastor ought to know His stuff, and ultimately to know Jesus personally and deeply through the word and the Spirit. The religious leaders noted that Peter and John weren’t learned men, but had been with Jesus. So I think there has to be other ways of training in godliness and wisdom than a master’s degree, which is too expensive for most individuals and churches to pursue. Too often I think we equate wisdom with intellectualism.

        Like

      2. preacherwin

        Absolutely. And, while Peter and John were not learned by conventional standards, the power of being personally mentored by Jesus is huge.

        That is one of the reasons that I support the model of mentored education set forth by TNARS (www.tnars.net). It is not the conventional model of big institutions and big debts, but it will train pastors well in the Word of God, of which we need more of in the pulpit.

        Great comments!

        w.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.